Comparison between hydroxyapatite/soapstone and hydroxyapatite/ reduced graphene oxide composite coatings : synthesis and property improvement.

dc.contributor.authorNicomedes, Daniel Nilson Nunes
dc.contributor.authorMota, Laureana Moreira
dc.contributor.authorVasconcellos, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorMedrado, Nathanael Vieira
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Michelle de
dc.contributor.authorAlvarenga, Érika Lorena Fonseca Costa de
dc.contributor.authorJuste, Karyne Ramos de Campos
dc.contributor.authorRighi, Ariete
dc.contributor.authorManhabosco, Sara Matte
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Guilherme Jorge Brigolini
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Fernando Gabriel da Silva
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Alan Barros de
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Ronaldo Junio Campos
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Jaqueline dos Santos
dc.contributor.authorManhabosco, Taíse Matte
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T21:32:30Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T21:32:30Z
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.description.abstractEconomic viability and eco-friendliness are important characteristics that make implants available to the pop- ulation in a sustainable way. In this work, we evaluate the performance of a low-cost, widely available, and eco- friendly material (talc from soapstone) relative to reduced graphene oxide as reinforcement to brittle hy- droxyapatite coatings. We employ a low-cost and straightforward technique, electrodeposition, to deposit the composite coatings on the titanium substrate. Corrosion, wear, and biocompatibility tests indicate that the reduced graphene oxide can be effectively replaced by talc without reducing the mechanical, anticorrosion, and biocompatible composite coatings properties. Our results indicate that talc from soapstone is a promising ma- terial for biomedical applications.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationNICOMEDES, D. N. N. et al. Comparison between hydroxyapatite/soapstone and hydroxyapatite/ reduced graphene oxide composite coatings: synthesis and property improvement. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, v. 121, 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612100299X?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 29 abr. 2022.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104618pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1751-6161
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15517
dc.identifier.uri2https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612100299X?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.rightsrestritopt_BR
dc.subjectSoapstone talcpt_BR
dc.subjectPulsed electrodepositionpt_BR
dc.subjectBiocompatibilitypt_BR
dc.titleComparison between hydroxyapatite/soapstone and hydroxyapatite/ reduced graphene oxide composite coatings : synthesis and property improvement.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo publicado em periodicopt_BR

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura Disponível
Nome:
ARTIGO_ComparisonHydroxiapatiteSoapstone.pdf
Tamanho:
8.57 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura Disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: